Finally a book on UML that makes sense to me (and is short enough so I was willing to read it, in one morning).

    Milestone 1: requirement review

    Everything starts with an analysis of the problem at hand. One thing learned and I'd like to clarify is requirement — it is a set of constraints (thus the word must, should). Requirements often cause confusion as they are taken as the system's objectives → in essence they are, but they are measured as a set of conditions that the system will have to behave within boundary. Thus, viewing them as the law for your design, it's a valid test to your test, but your design can come in many forms, and that's where engineering has some fun.

    So it becomes clear & natural that design and implementation are like people living in society → his behavior is completly boxed by law he has to obey, that's the minimal. Anything that no law permits nor prohibits (functions that links to no requirements), well, is just to keep the developers happy.

    Problem domain

    problems

    Any description of what the client is trying to do or what they want. There is no restriction at all. What comes out of it are:

    1. requirement
    2. domain modeling

    requirement

    1. Uses shall, must.
    2. Have a N-N mapping to use case → traceability from requirement → design → code → test.
    3. Many ways to cut it: functional requirement, data requirement, performance requirement, and so on.
    • A use case describes a unit of behavior.
    • Requirements describe the laws that govern that behavior.
    • Functions are the individual actions that occur within that behavior.

    domain modeling

    Quite similar to ERD from Django graph. The difference is that it doesn't yet care attributes or methods, and they are not necessarily translated 1-1 into a DB table.

    1. Pick out the nouns → domain models
    2. Formulating 3 relationships:

      1. generalization: parent → children class
      2. aggregation: roll up, eg. DailyRecordMonthlyRecord
      3. association: the closest understanding I can get is to describe the many-to-many relationships.

    use case

    This is the soul of UML (or at least for this book) since everything derives from it.

    1. Inputs: domain models & requirements.
    2. Two types:
      1. basic course of action
      2. alternative course of action → thus we can cover any exceptions we need to handle.
    3. Go expansive on case statement. We want to derive two things out of it:
      1. actor
      2. domain objects
    4. What helps ← visual and mockup user experience:
      1. GUI prototyping
      2. write a user manual in use case statement, or reverse engineering case statements from a legacy user manual
      3. wire frame, or any kind of GUI mockup
    5. Ask:
      1. what happens → then → then.... use the word invokes and precedes.
      2. what else can happen? → alternative course
    6. Being thorough is key

    Once you have done so called analysis, you reach the first milestone — requirement review. That's when client should sign off to recognize these set of use case do represent what they want to do.

    Milestone 2: design review

    With a set of use cases, we can break them down into design elements. This book talks in context of OOD, thus words like model and object are essentially a CLASS in code. We don't have to be bound by this. Instead, taking model as an abstract — it can be a database table, or a service — it's just a representation of a logical element that describes our view of breaking down the initial problem into a set of items who interacts with each other.

    How problem domain works w/ solution domain

    robustness diagrams

    Robustness diagram is optional. It is the transition from problem domain → solution domain because it starts to speak using design language, not natural English (as in use case) anymore.

    Robustness diagram is essentially a MVC framework. This is optional in the sense that this is a transition between problem domain to solution domain.

    1. Three types of objects:
      1. boundary obj ← interface, UI falls in this category → the V
      2. entity obj → can result in more domain models → the M
      3. control obj → will be translated to helper models, methods → the C
    2. One diagram per use case
    3. The good thing about robustness diagram is, there is strict rule of what is allowed:
      1. Actor can talk only to boundary objects.
      2. Boundary objects can talk only to controllers and actors.
      3. Entity objects can also talk only to controllers.
      4. Controllers can talk to both boundary objects and controllers, but not to actors.

    sequence diagram

    This is where the solution domain starts. Sequence diagram represents detailed design.

    1. Per use case ← both basic course and alternative course, try to fit them to the same diagram.
    2. On the side of sequence, note which use case it is for → traceability.
    3. We will end up with a list of classes and methods.
      1. allocation methods to class ← design pattern, eg. class factory vs. iterator

    state diagram

    1. Per class from sequence diagram, but cherry pick the important ones ← if it has only two states (on/off), don't bother.
    2. Three types of events:
      1. entry: do this when you enter this state
      2. exit: do this when you leave this state
      3. do: do this when you are at this state
      4. "guard": condition (True/False)

    Milestones 3 & 4: development and UAT

    UML doesn't address development. For completeness I'm adding two more milestones here:

    1. dev: topics such as test case fall into this place.
    2. release: the only thing matters is the UAT, which should come straightly from use cases.

    Here I also want to highlight the separation between development tool from test tool → programming your solution in Python does not dictate you to test in Python. If you look at the two type of test cases, I think unit test (whitebox) is tightly determined by implementation details → how thorough I traverse code paths (those if-else). It's often a matter of convenience to write them in the same language because the language itself offers a toolset for the purse, for example, Python's unit test framework.

    But blackbox cases have not such restriction — performance test can well be done using a tool that has no relevance with Python whatsoever because it only concerns use case which represents requirements! Therefore, these tests are what UAT is about. The whitebox tests, on the other hand, are for management purpose so you can have control of quality.

    Now, this separation of purse is not to support that quality is just for the internal use as long as UAT passes. In practice, use cases (= requirements) are simply not possible to address all qualities. Again going back the analogy of requirement being the law you obey in daily life, law often tells you what not to do, but does not tell you what you should do ← you can always live a despicable life but being a lawful citizen at the same time.

    A complete view of the framework

    Exercise

    We have a cowboy named Bill Bob, who is driving down the road at 80 miles an hour while drinking beer, scratching, and tossing the empty beer cans out the window of his pickup truck.

    1. domain models & relationships
    2. basic course use case diagram
    3. requirements

    — by Feng Xia

    Related:

      2018-11-27
    Reveal slides

    reveal.js is pretty awesome. I have been using it for the...

      2018-06-06
    Screencast

    Introduce tools to create screencast.